Friday, October 2, 2009

The Political Economy of Knowledge at UF

So, this is a post using basic statistical graphics to tell a story about the ethnic and gender make-up of the knowledge industry at the University of Florida. So, what do I mean by this? Basically, I want to look at the university as a factory, one that produces knowledge. Obviously, our knowledge factory is part of a larger knowledge industry called academia. It produces usable things (e.g., data) that are valued in the market economy of the modern world.

However, this metaphor becomes slippery when we think about things like the means of production and who controls them. There are two broad groups managing such resources within most universities; the administration and the faculty. So, do you think the ethnic and gender make-up of such groups matter to what kind of knowledge is produced and valued? I do...So, let's start at the beginning, with the undergraduates. The race and gender percentages of this group are often examined as a way to 'measure' the fairness of an institution. In other words, do minorities and women have roughly equal access to higher education?In terms of race, UF is more or less on par with the state's general population. Minority groups have slightly lower numbers enrolled at UF then in the general population; but, of course, UF is a historically white university (HWC).
UF actually seems to be doing pretty well in its admission of female students. The female undergraduates outnumber their male counterparts in each racial group.

The next set of figures I want to look at are the number of graduate students at UF along gender and race lines. The graduate students make up the next generation of knowledge industry managers. We will earn PhD's and eventually/hopefully receive jobs as faculty. Also, many of us will take administrative jobs at some point in our career.

So, how do the numbers at UF stack up for the grads?
Again, in terms of gender UF seems to be privileging their female students by admitting more of them. There is one major difference though, the number of female student within the non-resident grads is significantly lower. Hmmm....
In terms of race, US minority numbers take a significant hit, as do White Americans. Why's this? It's the large number of foreign students, many of whom work in the tech and 'hard' science fields. In the past, I spent a significant amount of time in the Computer Sciences Building and regularly came face-to-face with numerous tech workers from abroad, and few of them are female (see image above). I wonder, "what is the role of these students in their departments and respective fields?" Are they becoming part of the next generation of knowledge industry leaders? Does it matter if they do so in America or in their country of origin? Does the training of foreign students contribute to a kind of (neo)Colonization of the Mind?

These ponderings beg the question, "How does our foreign student population break down nationally?"
Many are coming from countries firmly stereotyped as producing mathematically and scientifically gifted students. However, I wonder what number of female and minority students gain entry to the knowledge industry as full-time producers (e.g., tenured faculty, tenure-track faculty).
Apparently, that number is relatively low. As you can see, by the time a generation 'rises' to the level of full-time faculty we see a return to a White dominated institution. [Full-Time Faculty refer to tenure-track and tenured faculty]

This raises an immediate pedagogical issue for me. How does the university speak to its non-White, and non-Male students, colleagues, and larger community? Hopefully, at least there are more female voices at UF; something demonstrating that all the female graduate students have an equal hope of landing that increasingly rare tenure-track position. Is this true at UF?
No.

What about the administration? What's the gender and race make-up here at UF? The image below shows the race and gender numbers for Administrative, Support/Service, Secretarial, Skilled Crafts, and Maintenance workers here at UF. Look closely, you'll see some disturbing trends. As you look at the graphic, ask yourself, why are certain jobs dominated by certain races and genders?
So, what does it all mean? Well, the University of Florida is what Eduardo Bonilla-Silva describes as a Historically White University (HWC), drawing on the term Historically Black College (HBC) as a way to demonstrate that racial grammars infect our daily interactions. Also, don't think this is unique to schools in the Deep South. Ivy League schools, you're probably a-lot worse.

The good news? If you're a white guy, the academy is still hiring! If you're not, you can always get married to a white guy or go home. Ultimately, this is all about privilege and who gets to keep it (see McIntosh - Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack). While my previous statement makes light of this deeply entrenched, historically conditioned reality, this is an important issue. Since institutions like universities produce successive generations of law makers, political personalities, and power brokers in general, shouldn't we have equal representation in terms of race in gender across the board? Don't we deserve equal representation in those institutions which wield power in our lives? I think something to that effect is stated somewhere in our legal system.

So, how do we change it? Well, the first step is to realize that it is changing. For most, the current rate of change is ruthlessly slow. The insulation of privilege continues to halt significant changes. I think this will be exacerbated with the current economic 'crises'. Many critical race scholars (see also the works by Pierre Bourdieu) talk about the reproduction of hierarchy in the education system. The first step they and others suggest in combating these inequalities is to name them. This post is a first step in naming them.

I invite others who might happen upon this post to do the same for their institutions. The charts created for this post are drawn from the information compiled by the University of Florida's Office of Institutional Planning and Research. I bet your university has a similar department, and I also bet it'll be difficult to find its data. However, every public university has to make this information available.

Its up to us to find this information, analyze it, translate it, and use it to name the inequality around us. I don't know about you, but I want to live in a world where I'm surrounded by minority and female voice at least as much as White Male ones. We can all help me make that dream a reality!

Si se puede!
-Ed

4 comments:

  1. Hmmm. I admire your analysis and the data is presented in a very clean and easy-to-understand manner. And although I agree with much of it (numbers don't lie), I think that one critical comparison is missing. Your case could be stronger if you compared these same numbers over the course of 20-30 years and tracked the rate of change. The existing number of white-male faculty in tenure positions is still skewed from the decades of white-male dominance in higher learning. That isn't anybody's fault. Everybody else is catching up fast. Women have recently begun to outnumber men at Universities, and colleges will soon be confronted with the task of how to entice more men to pursue higher education. I would rather focus on the positive rate of natural change than forcing minorities and women into positions just so the pie charts are more defensible. It is my perspective that things are changing fast and these graphs will look way different in 10-15 years as those old white guys die off.

    Very thought provoking, Ed. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "I would rather focus on the positive rate of natural change than forcing minorities and women into positions just so the pie charts are more defensible. It is my perspective that things are changing fast and these graphs will look way different in 10-15 years as those old white guys die off." --Elsa...

    I think Elsa is trying to get at the tendency for people to misuse demographic data that may be inconclusive or likely imperfect. Using superficial data to stimulate changes in policy is inefficient in the long run--but it fools a lot of people in the short run. I think I know what you're trying to say here, Ed. --I too believe we should have a more egalitarian society wherein everyone has similar opportunities based upon actual merit and not based upon superficial cultural perceptions.

    I would like to add to Elsa's comments that there is no such thing as "natural change." We are all influencing change whether we notice it or not. What is "natural" anymore..?

    Don't forget that those "old white guys" that will "die off" in 10-15 years are human beings too. In some instances a few have actually earned their positions with hard work. I don't think it's fair to over-generalize further propagating the mythology of an Old White Guy Conspiracy of which every white male is a member. Though in this present (cracker-enriched) political environment, it's very easy to go there...

    ReplyDelete
  3. In no way was I trying to imply that the "old white guys" did not earn their positions. I would argue that the overwhelming majority of them did. I was just trying to defend the progress that has already been made. I am a 35 yr old female living my career dreams and am the product of the same academic institutions as my male counterparts. And I too believe that personal merit should determine one's position in society. Most women would be furious to find out that they were chosen for a position just because they were a woman.

    I love your insight into "natural change". Good point!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think I understand your perspective, and there is supporting evidence for the Old White Male Conspiracy myth--there have been elitist males that have purposely reserved opportunities exclusively for those in their in-groups. I've witnessed it many times. I'm just saying it's the trend these days to lump us all in together. Thanks for your comments. Ed..? chime in any time...

    ReplyDelete